There's been wall-to-wall coverage of Facebook's latest travails, so we'll try to avoid rehashing what you already know. Obviously, the key question that emerges from the leaks, systems failure and congressional hearing is what to do about Facebook. For its part, the social media giant says increased regulation is the answer. If you agree, then you've stepped into Facebook's trap. Most companies would prefer there to be as little regulation as possible, but if regulation is introduced, then it's far less of a problem for a company the size of Facebook than it would be for smaller competitors. And of course, regulation is infinitely preferable to being broken up into constituent parts.
For many users of Facebook's platforms, Monday's protracted outage was an irritation - and for some businesses a hit to their revenues - but for parts of the world the impact was immense. In Brazil and Mexico, up to 98% of social media users are estimated to have Facebook accounts. And in India WhatsApp is used by over 459 million people. In some developing countries, Facebook's limited Free Basics service is the web. The extent to which that's true is illustrated in the Democratic Republic of Congo, where the Ministry of Communication reacted to the outage by taking to Twitter to assure the country that it hadn't cut off the internet. "We should not let one company run this much of the world," Motherboard argues.
So what's the answer? One possibility is offered by the BBC's R&D department which has been working with Nottingham University and Sir Tim Berners-Lee on a solution that is designed to give individuals control over their own data. The idea is that the data is stored on a device owned and controlled by the individual. According to Berners-Lee (who created the World Wide Web), "reconfiguring the web so that its users own and manage their data can turn the world 'the right way round'." The project is based on three principles; legibility, agency and negotiation. Legibility means we must be able to see our data and understand what is done with the information. Agency means we control where it's stored and what's done with it. And negotiation is about ensuring the owner derives value from it. The Register has an explainer.